On this blog and many others, the anti-white slant of the mainstream media is often highlighted. Recently, there has been an uptick in the number of anti-white hit pieces. This is due to the fact that the Las Vegas shooter was a white male. Now I’m not going to take a guess at the shooters motives, nor am I going to excuse the blame game the mainstream media plays. Nearly all mainstream media sources have written some kind of opinion piece on mass shootings this week that all blame white men. The media truly hates white men.
Before getting into the individual pieces, I feel it is necessary to get into the data set that is used against us. The MotherJones data set. They have two data sets; the 1982-2012 and 1982-2017 data set. For the sake of this piece we are referring to the 1982-2012 data set.
Mother Jones has an Editor’s note before the data is presented in that note it states that:
Our research has focused on indiscriminate rampages in public places resulting in four or more victims killed by the attacker. We exclude shootings stemming from more conventional crimes such as armed robbery or gang violence.
Why would they exclude gang violence? What is the point in that? Hhhhhmmm, really makes you think.
Oh yeah, gang membership is mostly non-white. Imagine that. No agenda here. Granted the data here is not exactly from 1982-2012, but the time period used by The National Gang Center fits well within the time frame. The point is clear. Most mass shootings committed by gang members are going to be non-white. The reason this matters is because if you include gang violence the numbers change. Take a look.
This chart is just from 2016, but it illustrates the point. You can radically change the numbers by removing gang violence. The insane part about this is when you consider the population of each race in the US. Whites are a majority. This should mean that they are a majority of Mass shooters. This however is taken by blacks who are 13.3% which means that whites are in fact under represented in these stats.
The other issue with this data set is the slight of hand tricks they pull with race. The first thing I noticed was the lack of Arabs as a classification for race. You know as well as I do that this group of people is most likely to go on some type of killing spree. They spread them out into whites, blacks, and other. When you account for Arabs the numbers change like someone did on Twitter. I would like to give credit here, but I do not know who made this.
Once you take into account the Arab population in the US, you find that for their size they are most at risk for mass shootings.
See when you ignore the fact that Whites are a majority at 61.3% of the US population, you ignore the statistical likelihood of them being a mass shooter. When you take into consideration population size you are able to see what group is more at risk.
I would also like to point out that these assholes at Mother Jones did not include Emmanuel Samson. The shooting passes all of their metrics. Except that it is a non-white person targeting whites of course. I’m sure they’ll fix their omission.
As you can see the data used here is purposefully slated against whites. People citing this data set are being dishonest and anti-white. Let’s have a look at the pricks who believe this data is useful.
I encourage you to read this bullshit first hand. The quotes below are pulled from this article. For full context please read the original.
Let’s begin this one by stating that the author of this piece is a Muslim and I am going to assume an Arab for that matter. As stated above, Muslim Arabs are most at risk for these type of shootings. Not white men. Let’s just say this woman has advocated for Muslims more than once. This piece here is a clear attempt at that. I mean with a title like “How America has silently accepted the rage of white men” there is a clear agenda here. She is seeking to condemn whites instead of confronting the violent nature of her own.
The most annoying and egregious part of this piece is the use of the Mother Jones data.
According to an analysis by Mother Jones, out of 62 cases between 1982 and 2012 (a time period that would not include the actions of Dylann Roof or Stephen Paddock, among others), 44 of the killers were white men and only one was a woman. Since 1982, mass shootings in the United States have been committed by white men who are often labeled “lone wolves” or “psychologically impaired.”
As I have stated above, the Mother Jones data is heavily flawed, but this point is easily rebutted: whites are the majority in the US. Yeah, the majority population is going to commit the majority of any crime. After that she makes the annoying point that the people who commit these crimes are labeled as mentally ill. Well they are. The data from Mother Jones even lists the ‘Prior signs of mental health issues’. Not that their mental health is causal, but they have clear psychological issues.
The contrast is then brought up between this and terror committed by foreign born terrorists.
Any other path — let’s say, for example, abortion or foreign-born terror — that led to the destruction of life on this level would be attacked as violently opposed to American values.
Well if there is no clear motive and a person has a mental illness for the sake of explanation and to allow us to move on we call it mental illness. Need I remind you of the terror incident that Dylan Roof committed? Everyone called this terrorism.
Furthermore a terrorist act is one that has political ends to it. If a Muslim, I don’t know, shoots up a nightclub in the name of Allah, we have a clear motive. Not a hard thing to understand.
Apparently her sand brain can’t wrap itself around the per capita argument that is so important here.
I ignored the phoney gun death stats because that shit is so tiresome. Most gun deaths are suicide. Shut up about it! Prevent suicide if you want to reduce these numbers. Anyway next article.
To start this off I would like to actually thank Mr. Daniel Engber. He did not buy the Mother Jones bullshit and actually attacked it. This was a shock to all of us. He did however decide that he is going to go along with this insipid idea of ‘White Male Entitlement’.
White male entitlement has to be ludicrous insane and annoying reason to use for mass shootings. For this guy just say that whites do this out of entitlement is hilarious. For the sake of argument, let’s say that white males do have a sense of entitlement. So what? This country was founded by our ancestors. This country was founded, built, and sustained by white men. No other group contributed. Maybe we should have a little bit of entitlement.
White males use the smallest amount of government assistance. We as a demographic are the backbone american Nation. All other groups need our resources. Yeah, maybe we feel a little overused. Not entitled, but like we are the only ones that give a fuck.
Now with that said I don’t think white men a sense of entitlement. If we did maybe we would do something about the situation we are in. Maybe we would stop our demographic replacement. Stop the idiotic Wars. Stop our men and women from being spiritually and emotionally destroyed. Stop the attacks on our history. White men aren’t entitled. White men are continuously beaten down.
Please read the article for full context.
Another article that uses the Mother Jones data. Here’s what they say:
Statistics show that since 1982, the majority of mass shootings — 54 percent — were committed by white men, according to data from Mother Jones. Black people were the second largest perpetrators of mass shootings based on ethnic background, but only accounted for roughly 16 percent of the total incidents during the same time period.
Again going all in on the white man. Whites are the majority of the population assholes.
The article goes on to yell at white men for being entitled:
“There’s a feeling of entitlement that white men have that black men don’t,” criminologist James Alan Fox told The Washington Post in 2012. “They often complain that their job was taken by blacks or Mexicans or Jews. They feel that a well-paid job is their birthright. It’s a blow to their psyche when they lose that. . . . If you’re a member of a group that hasn’t historically experienced unemployment, there’s a far greater stigma to [losing a job] than those who have.”
I covered the entitlement feeling that white supposedly have in the slate article, but doesn’t this just piss you off?
There are more articles and they are probably worse than the ones outlined. I am going to have to call it quits. The media hates us. The gun control bullshit is a guise to attack us. Even if the likelihood of any given white shooting a place up is much less than any other race. It’s ridiculous.