Have you ever been lied to so bad that it made you laugh? You know the type of lie that is so egregious that you aren’t even mad. You just laugh at how dishonest people can be. It’s the type of dishonesty that ruins your faith in humanity. Well, I found an opinion piece by a man named: Sasha Polakow-Suransky, titled ‘White Nationalism is Destroying the West’.
Before continuing with my article give his a read here.
Sasha, begins this article off with a flurry of obfuscations.
One of the law’s first victims was a third-generation Frenchwoman who was ordered by the police to strip off her veil while onlookers shouted, “Go back to your country.” Still, many French politicians and intellectuals rushed to defend the ban. The former president Nicolas Sarkozy called modest swimwear “a provocation”; Alain Finkielkraut, a prominent philosopher, argued that “the burkini is a flag.” But what they presented as a defense of secular liberal values was in fact an attack on them — a law, masquerading as neutral, had explicitly targeted one religious group.
Here we have the paragraph where this guy tries to hide the origins of the women in this paragraph by calling her a “third generation French women” which translates to Muslim whose parents are from some Middle Eastern shit hole.
Then he tries to tie the horror felt from a terrorist attack that killed 86 people to the inconvenience some Muslims feel from a burka ban in France. Just think about that. What kind of dildo does that?
Then he goes on to say that Islam isn’t anywhere close to seizing power in the west. Well, I would like to bring up London’s current mayor, Sadiq Khan. Yeah, he’s a mayor and he is a Muslim. Sounds like Muslims are gaining power. Not a lot, but it is a threat. That threat is huge. Islamic laws are the exact antithesis to Western laws. That is enough to worry whites.
Then he goes on about White Nationalists seizing power. Even if you believe Donald Trump is a White Nationalist. The basic idea of White Nationalism is not anti-western. It is in fact pro-western in its defense of the founding stock of all western nations.
To even compare people who defend whites to a group of people that believe in marrying their cousins, polygamy, stoning, and a plethora of other stone age practices is not only ridiculous, but a flat out lie. White nationalism is the intent of the west.
The premise that White Nationalism is some how anything but the original intent of the West is laughable. The founders of the US itself were White Nationalists. In fact the very first act of the US congress was to establish Naturalization laws for the new country.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed
Citizenship being granted only to free white people sounds like a white nationalist act to me. Then the congress in 1795 repealed this with a new naturalization act in 1795. I bet it was because it was racist.
SEC.1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on the following conditions, and not otherwise: —
First. He shall have declared, on oath or affirmation, before the supreme, superior, district, or circuit court of some one of the states, or of the territories northwest or south of the river Ohio, or a circuit or district court of the United States, three years, at least, before his admission, that it was bona fide, his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and particularly, by name, the prince, potentate, state or sovereignty whereof such alien may, at that time, be a citizen or subject.
Oh, looks like they kept that verbiage in there ‘free white men.’ That’s weird. It’s like this nation was meant to be for whites. I’m sure they botched that and fixed it quickly, because that policy really hurt the poor third world immigrants. Right Sasha, the congress sure did change it from favoring whites to favoring third world immigrants until 1965.
The point is that the US was founded by and for whites. Poland and Hungary are currently refusing non-white immigrants. Europe as a whole has historically been for whites. To say that white nationalism is destroying the west is a goofy assertion. White Nationalism is the Western way. Whites founded and built the west. Whites do not owe their nations to anyone but their progeny.